Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Of the facts charged of this case, abuse of authority and obstruction of another’s exercise of rights are acquitted.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On February 2, 2012, the Defendant graduated from a professional law school, passed the bar examination on March 2012, and was ordered by a prosecutor on April 1, 2012, and was under training at the law school training center, and was subject to on-the-job training at the Seoul East District Prosecutors' Office from October 2, 2012.
1. On November 10, 2012, the Defendant of acceptance of bribe on November 22, 2012, 2012, at the first-class E prosecutor's office of the Seoul Dong District Prosecutors' Office located in Gwangjin-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Seoul Dong District Prosecutors' Office, which was designated as the principal prosecutor, demanded the F of the case against the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thie, 43 years of age) of the Seoul Dong Prosecutors' Office 2012-type and 45641 (thie, 43 years of age) to attend the above E prosecutor's office around 14:00 on Saturdays.
From November 10, 2012, the Defendant, from around 14:00 to around 14:0, had F investigate the theft suspicion against F in the above E-inspection room and prepare a statement as to the recognition of the suspicion.
In the course of investigation, the Defendant knew that F will be sentenced to sentence, and that F will be sentenced to sentence. On the same day, the F, which prepared a written statement at around 18:00, came into physical contact with F, which was similar to F, and continued to be transferred to E of the above Seoul East East District Prosecutors' Office, and entered F and once.
As above, the Defendant received a bribe in relation to his duties by comparing F with F, which is similar to F, and then comparing F with F.
2. On November 12, 2012, the Defendant of acceptance of bribe on November 2012, 2012: around November 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) moved F to SM5 car (G) that the Defendant was waiting for himself before the departure of the subway Line 2 located in the Dong-dong Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwangjin-gu, in the direction of the king direction; (b) moved the said case within the said car to F with F, which called the front line; and (c) subsequently, the Defendant moved F to the Jelel located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the region near the subway station, in response to the offer to the offer to the F, and moved the case to the Gelel located in Seongdong-gu, Seoul, in around 20:41 on the same day.