logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2015.02.12 2009가합8748
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff, the defendant Ansan-si, the 155,36,445 won in Ansan-si, the 846,153,527 won in defendant B, the 169,230,705 won in defendant C, and the 28.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On January 2, 2006, L Union received the registration of ownership transfer as to shares of 1,869.31/4 of the members of Ansan-si, the Korea Water Resources Corporation (hereinafter “instant land”). On the same day, L Union received the registration of ownership transfer as to shares of 26.4/2,054/4 of the instant land from N on the same day.

(The above shares were transferred by N on November 30, 2005 from the Korea Water Resources Corporation (hereinafter “Supplementary Intervenor”). The Intervenor (hereinafter “Supplementary Intervenor”) obtained on January 2, 2006 the registration of the transfer of ownership as to the shares of 1,895.75/4 (=1,869.31 shares, 26.4 shares, hereinafter “the shares of this case”) out of the land of this case from L Union on January 2, 2006, as well as the registration of the transfer of ownership as to the shares of 158.65 shares, which are the remainder of the land of this case, from O, etc. on the same day (hereinafter “the remaining shares of this case”).

Meanwhile, after concluding a contract for construction work to establish a commercial building on the instant land between the supplementary intervenor and the supplementary intervenor, the L Union’s joint owner was designated as P and the supplementary intervenor, who is the president of the L Union. According to Q’s provisional attachment registration commission, the supplementary intervenor’s creditor, the registration of ownership was completed on March 22, 2006 with respect to the said new building (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. As to the progress of the auction procedure of this case and the acquisition of the Plaintiff’s ownership (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”), R applied for a compulsory auction of real estate to this court S, and Defendant C applied for a voluntary auction of real estate to this court, respectively, and Defendant E and Defendant J applied for a voluntary auction of real estate to U.S. concerning the building of this case.

Dor. The plaintiff is each of the above.

arrow