logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.07.02 2015고단829
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 19, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Crime of Crime”) at the Gwangju District Court. On January 23, 2009, the same court was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime. On November 3, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for four months in the same court for the same crime. On May 12, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million for the same crime by the same court.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 21:20 on March 15, 2015, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license, driven a DK5 vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 40 meters alcohol concentration of about 0.140% from the 40-meter section to the front road of the Suwon Hospital located in the Dong-gu Gwangju mine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. License register, report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, summary orders, and application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. As stated in the reasoning of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for probation and community service order, there was a history of punishment several times including a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the blood alcohol content was 0.140% higher than that of the instant crime. However, in light of the fact that the instant crime does not lead to a traffic accident, a sentence shall be determined as ordered.

arrow