The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with labor for four months) by the lower court is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. It is reasonable to respect the sentencing conditions compared to the judgment of the first instance court, if there is no change in the sentencing conditions, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, the lower court, based on the foregoing legal doctrine, determined the sentence by comprehensively taking account of the various circumstances as stated in its reasoning.

In addition to the circumstances indicated by the lower court, no new circumstance exists to change the sentence of the lower court in the trial, and the fact that the Defendant appears to have been under mental and medical treatment to escape from gambling addiction appears to have been continuously receiving the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing of the lower court does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, even if considering all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the argument of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.