The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court affirmed the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant of the violation of the National Security Act (e.g., supporting quantity, rubber, etc.) on July 14, 2009 and January 18, 2010, and reversed the first instance judgment that found the Defendant guilty of the violation of each of the National Security Act (e.g., supporting quantity, rubber, etc.) and the rest of each of the violation of the National Security Act (e.g., supporting quantity, rubber, etc.) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act and acquitted the Defendant.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the violation of the National Security Act (e.g., supporting, rubber, etc.) and general traffic obstruction, etc.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.