The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows. Paragraph (2) is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court adds the judgment to this court. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The "Appraiser" of the 8th half of the judgment of the first instance shall be deemed to be "Appraiser of the first instance court", and this court shall be deemed to be "the first instance court".

The 9th half of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be referred to as "appraisals of the first instance" and shall be referred to as "appraisals of the first instance."

2. An abbreviation of the court’s additional determination is based on the judgment of the court of first instance.

The plaintiff submitted additional evidence Nos. 21, 22, and 23 to this court, and found Gap evidence Nos. 21, 22, and 23 to the effect that "the plaintiff and the defendant can not claim the rent of the land of this case to the plaintiff," and thus, it is acknowledged that the above contract Nos. 21, 21, and 22-2, and the above contract Nos. 223 are the true document which is recognized as the authenticity by each of the evidences No. 21-1, 2, 22-2, and 23. The plaintiff asserted to the purport that "the plaintiff and the defendant cannot claim the rent of the land of this case to the plaintiff, since the transaction under the contract of this case is completed under the contract of this case and the redemption note of this case," and therefore, it is acknowledged that the contract of this case and the redemption note of this case are the authenticity of the contract of this case."

However, in the first instance court, the plaintiff submitted the evidence Nos. 9 and 10 to the plaintiff's representative, and in relation thereto, the plaintiff's last sales contract (Evidence No. 9) and the final loan certificate and the statement of confirmation of repayment (Evidence No. 10) with respect to the land of this case, which were found to have been disposed of by the plaintiff's representative, were submitted to this court without any specific reason, and the plaintiff submitted the evidence No. 22-1 (the statement of agreed acceptance) with respect to the plaintiff's documents submitted by him.