logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.04.17 2014고단3986
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A In six months of imprisonment, Defendant B is punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won, Defendant C is punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C’s co-principal are the owners of commercial sex acts establishments with the trade name “G” located on the second floor of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government FF underground, and Defendant B, and Defendant C are the persons working for the said establishments as the managers of business offices.

No one shall perform any act of engaging in sexual traffic, arranging sexual traffic, etc. with many and unspecified persons by giving or receiving, or promising to give or receive money, valuables or other property benefits.

Nevertheless, on October 14, 2014, the Defendants arranged the act of similarity by receiving KRW 90,00 from male customers H, who found the above business establishment around 22:30,000, and having D, a female employee, neglect the H’s sexual organ with his/her entrance and hand, and arranged for sexual traffic at the above business establishment from September 17, 2014, and Defendant C from October 9, 2014 to October 23:50.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. The defendant A is a person who is not accredited as a massage, and is not a massage technician, but a person may not establish a massage place.

Nevertheless, from September 17, 2014 to October 14, 2014, the Defendant established a marina business with the trade name “G” from around September 17, 2014, and employed female employees, such as I, J, K, L, M, N, andO, who were not qualified to be a massage, and had them engage in the massage business.

Accordingly, the Defendant established a massage clinic without qualification.

3. The Defendant: (a) around October 14, 2014, around 22:30, at the six rooms located in the said “G” business; (b) had a male customer H’s sexual organ h with his/her hand and her hand, and had the customer h’s sexual organ h’s sexual organ h were examined; and (c) committed similar acts.

Accordingly, the defendant committed sexual traffic.

4. Defendant E is unable to identify the name of Defendant E at the above “G” establishment around October 14, 2014.

arrow