A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:55 on June 27, 2015, the Defendant was unable to engage in a wind to detect the articles used at the construction site by using the gap in the victim's management at the E-road construction site in the above construction site, and to install a boom vehicle near the above construction site, and to detect the unfluoring dust in the market price, the victim's possession, which was placed on the floor of the above construction site, was located on the surface of the above construction site, and to easily carry the brud off the above brud vehicle onto the freight column, and to detect the dust with the unfluoring pipe at the center in order to remove the bruds in the above brud vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to steal the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant at a certain construction site in court (the statement that there is an entry above the date and time stated in the statement);

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. A report on investigation (distance to the suspect's residence at the site);

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the Defendant entered the construction site of this case to use the 112 reported case handling specifications, the level of site conditions, and field photographs [the Defendant and his defense counsel merely entered the construction site of this case and did not have the intention of theft, and they did not have any intention of moving the clamping dust.

In that sense, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant set up a vehicle in the vicinity of the construction site of this case where access to the site of this case is obstructed at night, and entered the construction site of this case, went away from the f in the night patrol near the center, and took a bicycle against the police officer who called the f in the night patrol, etc., and did not explain the reason for the act, and the F did not have any explanation to the reason for the act. The defendant was found from the center separated from the center, where the clamping is located inside the construction site of this case.