beta
Text
1. A notary public against the Plaintiff by the Defendants against D, Law Firm D, July 30, 2007, No. 1375.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendants were owners of 3,514 square meters in Gumi-si E (hereinafter “instant land”). On March 8, 2004, the Defendants concluded a sales contract with F to sell the instant land, and entered into a sales contract with G a buyer as of March 8, 2004 with the purchase price of KRW 740,000,000 (the contract amount of KRW 80,000,000, intermediate payment and remainder of KRW 660,00,000).
(hereinafter “instant sales contract”). B.
The intermediate payment and the remainder payment date of the instant sales contract were June 23, 2004. However, on June 25, 2004, F prepared a performance memorandum in the name of G (hereinafter “each of the instant notes”) with the following content in order to extend the payment deadline for the remaining land as it did not immediately obtain a construction permit for the instant land from Gumi-si.
The instant land was purchased and sold on March 8, 2004, and the relationship between the seller and the buyer on June 23, 2004 and the remainder 660,000,000 won was not performed, and the first set of funds due to the delay in intermediate payment and balance was agreed by the mutual agreement between the seller and the buyer.
7.15. Payment of 10,000,000 won for performance by the date of implementation;
7. In the event that payments are made up to 31. 20,000 won shall be paid. If the buyer fails to perform within the above 1 and 2 periods, a letter of performance will be given to waive the down payment.
The old-si Si finally rejected the application for building permit for the instant land, and the F obtained a building permit on December 23, 2005 through administrative litigation.
The construction contractor who originally developed the instant land is difficult to purchase the instant land under H’s name. In order to increase the loan amount, the construction contractor prepared a sales contract with the Defendants at KRW 800,000,000 with the purchase price.
E. The Defendants and F agreed to pay the remainder of KRW 600,000,000 in advance among the remainder of KRW 660,000,000, and to postpone the due date for payment of KRW 60,000. The Defendants and F drafted a written confirmation on June 14, 2006 as follows:
b.0.0 c.