logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.07.21 2017고단394
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 18, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten-month imprisonment due to an injury, etc. at the Changwon District Court’s branch branch on March 18, 2016, and the sentence becomes final and conclusive on March 26, 2016, and is currently under the suspended sentence.

The Defendant 2017 Go-J 394, "The 2017 Go-J 394", as the victim C (V, 19 years of age), had the Defendant's new female-friendly Gu, on the ground that the victim informed the Defendant of the same remaining fact even after he had been employed by the victim and the Defendant.

On January 8, 2017, around 17:00, the Defendant discovered the victim who was hidden in a female toilet on the second floor of the D building D on January 8, 2017, and took the victim's left arms by hand and forced him to take the victim's hand, and caused the victim's shoulder to be pushed off with the wall, and caused the victim's back water to the wall by being pushed off with the victim's shoulder by hand, and turned off the victim's bridge by walking on the wall.

On the other hand, the defendant continued to run away from the back of the victim with the escape of an emergency exit, and the victim's shoulder was pushed down by a lush hand.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted multiple injuries on the victim in need of treatment for about 14 days.

"2017 Highest 535"

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a NAS-coo vehicle.

On March 10, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 23:40 on March 10, 2017, and proceeded with the G store road in front of the G store in the city F on the front side of the city street.

Since there are lots of vehicles that are frequently and are waiting for signal signaling on the front door, there was a duty of care to see the front door for those engaged in driving business, and to drive safely by accurately operating the steering and steering devices.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to observe the signal at the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle.

arrow