1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including those resulting from the participation, shall be all included.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 23, 2006, the Mayor of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government formulated and publicly announced a master plan for urban and residential environment improvement (hereinafter “master plan”) with a content that designates the area of 71,000 square meters in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a zone to be rearranged (hereinafter “previous zone to be rearranged”).

B. On June 7, 2006, the D Reconstruction Improvement Project Establishment Promotion Committee comprised of owners of lands, etc. within the previous zone to be rearranged (hereinafter “instant promotion committee”) submitted to the Defendant an application for approval of the formation of the Housing Reconstruction Improvement Project Establishment Promotion Committee to implement the E-area Housing Reconstruction Project.

C. After reviewing the above application on August 7, 2006, the defendant decided that 180 of 336 owners of the entire land, etc. of the previous zone to be rearranged (53.57% of the consent rate) consents, and approved the composition of the promotion committee of this case.

(hereinafter “instant formation approval”) D.

On February 27, 2008, the instant promotion committee requested the Defendant to change the rearrangement plan and district designation that requested the Defendant to change the area to be rearranged as stipulated in the said basic plan. The said application was accompanied by 124 written consent from 180 owners of the land, etc. who consented to the composition of the instant promotion committee.

E. On June 30, 201, the Mayor of Seoul Metropolitan Government changed the zone to be rearranged of the said master plan to the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 38,376.2 square meters, and designated the said zone as a A-area housing reconstruction improvement zone (hereinafter “instant improvement zone”), and publicly announced it.

F. On March 19, 2014, the instant promotion committee applied for authorization to establish an association with 365 written consent from 477 owners of the land, etc. in the instant improvement zone (hereinafter “instant application for authorization”), and the Defendant approved the establishment of the Intervenor’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) on March 28, 2014.

hereinafter referred to as "the case."