logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.12.01 2014고단5386
공무상비밀누설
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant served as the Director-General of the Korea Coast Guard from July 2012 to April 30, 2014, and currently serves as E of the Korea Coast Guard.

On April 2, 2014, the Defendant ordered D’s criminal and F’s officers belonging to F’s Department to investigate the charges of the Shipping Association’s corruption. Accordingly, F’s police officers applied for a warrant of search and seizure of the above association’s office on April 9, 2014 and, at the same time, planned to execute the search and seizure of the association’s office office when the warrant is issued. Thus, the Defendant, who is the Director-General, is prohibited from divulging this fact to another person.

Nevertheless, on April 10, 2014, at the office of the National Maritime Police Agency in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant reported the fact that the warrant of search and seizure was issued to the shipping association that applied before the FJ G from the FJ president, and that “I would have been subject to search and seizure from the JJ at the Sea.”

Accordingly, the defendant informed I of the fact about the search and seizure of the investigation of the above case, and divulged public secrets.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of statement concerning K, L, G, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to search, seizure, verification warrant, duplicate copy, and seizure protocol copy;

1. Article 127 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (as the defendant has served in good faith as a police officer for 17 years, and as the defendant did not obtain any separate consideration in the course of the crime of this case) is more than the same

arrow