beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with labor for one year, for six months, for Defendant B and E, for Defendant C with a fine of 4,00,000, for Defendant D.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On March 25, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., at the Changwon District Court on March 25, 201, and on December 9, 2011, the same court was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging private documents, etc., and the said sentence became final and conclusive on December 7, 2011, and the said sentence was terminated on May 5, 2014.
[2015 order 309] Defendant A sent a small amount of money to the entrance and exit account of the gambling site as he did not receive money, and Defendant A received a false report to the police station that had received financial fraud, and received the confirmation of the instant accident from the relevant bank upon receiving the confirmation of the fact of the instant accident from the relevant bank, by applying for suspension of payment to the said gambling site operator. Defendant C, B, and D received the said criminal act as defective and approved the said act.
1. The defendant A and C's joint criminal conduct;
A. On August 26, 2014, the Defendants sent 100,000 won to the account in the name of H in order to request the suspension of payment by the Defendants at the Changbu Police Station in Changwon-si, Changwon-si. However, the Defendants filed a false report with the police officer that “The Defendants sent 100,000 won to the national bank account in the name of H, one of which I known as necessary for the hospital expenses through the NA-do Mete Mesen, and then sent 100,000 won to the national bank account in the name of H, which I notified as the need for the hospital expenses, and later there was no call call that they would be sent money, and thus there was no request for punishment of a person who was killed in the name of the victim.” The Defendants filed a false request for remedy for damage caused by telecommunications-based financial fraud with the issuance of a false report.
Defendant
A around that time, the name-free Internet using the above account.