1. The counterclaim Defendant: 2,750,108 won to the counterclaim and 5% per annum from March 17, 2015 to November 9, 2016.

1. On March 17, 2015, the counterclaim Defendant driven a C&L car (hereinafter “Counterclaim Defendant’s vehicle”) on March 17, 2015, and proceeded into the front side of the secondary apartment house located in the front side of the B/L in the B/L in the B/L of the B/L at the time of the G/L. On the front side of the B/L apartment at the time of the G/L, the vehicle was illegally parked on the right side due to the vehicle parked on the right side. The Counterclaim Plaintiff was driving a Dststuna car (hereinafter “Counterclaim Plaintiff”) on the front side of the right side of the moving direction, and the vehicle was moving back to the front side of the B/L on the front side of the moving direction. While the Lessee and the counterclaim Defendant found a mutually opposite vehicle and suspended their vehicles, there was an accident that conflicts between the front side part of the vehicle and the front front part of the vehicle on the left side.

(See the attached field medicine, hereinafter “instant traffic accident”). In the instant traffic accident, the Lessee suffered injury on the left-hand side of bad faith, such as “Isk-gu”, “Isk-gu”, “Mask-gu on the left-hand side of bad faith”, “Mask-gu, Gyeongk-gu, Gyeongk-gu, Gyeongk-gu,

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Gap evidence Nos. 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4 (including a serial number), and the result of the fact-finding reply to the Gansan Central Hospital of the Hansan Medical Foundation of the Seoul Medical Foundation of this Court to the fact-finding (the counter-party asserted that the counter-party lost his/her duty of care due to the traffic accident of this case, but it is difficult for the court to reverse the above recognition solely on the basis of the results of physical appraisal entrustment to the president of the Yong-nam University Hospital of this case and the statement of reference materials submitted by the counter-party after the conclusion of the

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the factual basis prior to the occurrence of the liability for damages, the counterclaim Defendant was driving with the central line, and it is inevitable for the counterclaim Defendant to drive the vehicle illegally parked.