logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.05.24 2017고단1301
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 19, 2017, from around 22:00 to 23:25, the Defendant: (a) made female employees feel sexual humiliation, such as “D” at the main point of “D” managed by the victim C in Guriri-si; and (b) made the victim’s hand at a canter, and “the victim’s hand at a canter,” thereby interfering with the victim’s business by making the victim’s operation by carrying the words “the victim’s hand at a canter; and (c) driving away the victim; and (d) repeating the words “the victim’s second B B B B,” and preventing customers from entering the main point, thereby interfering with the victim’s business operation by force.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, destroyed a substitute stone table by breaking up the table table, breaking up the table table, breaking up the table, breaking up it, rackers, air conditioners, air conditioners, and racks up the total market value of 1.8 million won, which is the victim's own property, and damaged its utility by destroying the table table of proxy stone table, shock, 2 packs, rackers, 1 air conditioners, 3 air conditioners, and racks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to C by the police in the protocol; and

1. Application of each video statute to damaged photographs and CCTV images CDs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Obstructing the sentencing of Article 59 of the Act on the Observation of Protection and Community Service Orders (the scope of applicable sentences under law), the main sentence of Article 62-2(1), Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act, and Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection [the scope of applicable sentences under law] by not more than seven years and six months [the type of decision]: A crime of damaging property interfering with the duties of a group of crime interfering with duties

arrow