Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a dentist who operates "D's clinic" in the original city C, and the defendant A is an assistant nurse who works for the above hospital.

1. Around October 23, 2017, Defendant A issued a judgment that the above hospital requires a dental examination for patients E, F, and G, and that the pertinent patient requires a dental treatment. Around October 24, 2017, Defendant A issued a judgment that the above hospital requires a dental examination for patients H and I, and that the pertinent patient requires a dental treatment, etc., and written a dental examination table in the name of dentist B.

Accordingly, Defendant A did each medical practice even though he was not a doctor.

2. Defendant B, an employee of Defendant B, committed each of the above offenses against the Defendant’s duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each written statement;

1. Accusation of a violator of the Medical Service Act, a dentist's license, a nurse's license, notification of a violation of an unfair medical examination confirmation, a certificate of entrance and discharge, a dental examination report, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to information about

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Articles 87(1)2 and 27(1) of the Medical Service Act, and the choice of fines

(b) Defendant B: Articles 91, 87(1)2, and 27(1) of the Medical Service Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;