beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 100,244,463 as well as its annual 5% from July 27, 2009 to July 8, 2014 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. On July 27, 2009, Nonparty B is the Defendant’s vehicle at C around 23:42 on July 27, 2009.
(B) When driving a vehicle and making a left turn from 6th page of the Yon-dong Sejong-dong, the accident that caused the injury of the plaintiff walking along the road on the left side of the Defendant vehicle due to the shock of the Yon-dong Yon-do Yon-do Yon-do Yon-do Yon-do Yon-do Yon-do (hereinafter “instant accident”) due to the shock of the plaintiff walking along the road on the left side of the Yon-do Yon-do Yon-do Yon
(2) The Plaintiff was hospitalized in a hospital from July 27, 2009 to January 15, 2010.
3) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement on the Defendant’s vehicle (based on recognition). The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement on the Defendant’s vehicle (based on recognition) without dispute, entry and video of Gap’s Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 10 (if available, the number is included in the number number
B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident in this case as a mutual aid business operator.
C. According to the evidence mentioned earlier prior to the limitation of liability, the accident location of this case is not divided into India and roadway, and it is recognized that the vehicle is cross-sectioned by a majority of the vehicles (the width of 6m or less), and considering the fact that the driver is in a situation where the driver is not able to see pedestrians rather than low time, the driver is also obligated to safely walk by examining the progress of the vehicle operated by the plaintiff. The plaintiff is deemed to have neglected it, and such mistake of the plaintiff is deemed to have caused the occurrence and expansion of damage caused by the accident of this case, and it is assessed to the extent of 10% of the plaintiff's error.
2. The same shall apply in addition to the detailed statement of calculation of damages, except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages.
5/12 percent per month.