logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.05.26 2015가합24311
임시당회장 파송결의 무효확인 등
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff C.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From March 201 to November 11, 2014, Plaintiff C was a representative of the B church affiliated with Plaintiff A religious organization (hereinafter “Plaintiff church”) in South-dong-gu, Incheon, and the Plaintiff A religious organization (hereinafter “Plaintiff church”), and Defendant A religious organization D’s association (hereinafter “Defendant Union”) is an association to which the Plaintiff church belongs.

B. On November 4, 2014, the Plaintiff church G notified the Defendant Labor Association of the purport that “The Plaintiff C would commit sexual indecent acts after his/her appointment, try to sell the church building with a bad intent, remove the internal collector and the authority, and leave the church in the place where criminal punishment would be imposed upon his/her will.” As such, the Plaintiff church G notified the Defendant Labor Association of the purport that “The Plaintiff would seek a solution because it is under circumstances in which it is impossible to put the church in the place where he/she would be subject to criminal punishment after filing a complaint from his/her usual will.”

C. On November 11, 2014, the Defendant’s association organized an emergency trial office, and made a resolution to send Plaintiff C to the temporary chairperson of the Plaintiff’s church (hereinafter “instant resolution”) the same day, namely, the resolution to dismiss the Plaintiff C from the office of the Plaintiff church. The Plaintiff C attempted to withdraw from the association for the purpose of voluntary disposal of the church’s properties, and habitually committed the seven titles, such as sexual indecent acts, and thereby dealing with the dismissal under the resolution of the company stipulated in Chapter 6 of Chapter 49 of the Ordinance on the Disciplinary Authority of the General Assembly (hereinafter “the instant dismissal disposition”), and the E, as the temporary chairperson of the Plaintiff church (hereinafter “instant resolution”). D.

Plaintiff

C On November 9, 2014, on November 16, 2014, publicly announced that the withdrawal from the Defendant’s association will be a joint meeting with the agenda item, and decided to withdraw from the Defendant’s association with the consent of 14 of the 14 members among the 14 members present among the 14 members present at the meeting, although the Defendant’s association was notified of the dismissal group of this case as above by the Defendant’s association.

[Post, A Religious Organization Hashe has joined the Hamno Council].

On the other hand, on December 30, 2014, Plaintiff C is the Incheon District Court Decision 2014Ra9433 on the grounds that it was committed in connection with Plaintiff C’s association I.

arrow