logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.22 2017가단5231693
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From August 2009 to April 201, 2014, C: (a) from E, the owner of 394.12 square meters of the instant building (hereinafter “instant building”) in the name of “F Councilor” among the instant buildings, C operated an entertainment business with the trade name of “H dan” by leasing part of the instant building from May 2013 to “H dan”; and (b) from around May 2013, G operated a restaurant with the trade name of “I” by E, the owner of the instant building.

B. The Plaintiff entered into a J insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with E as the instant building (insurance value of KRW 120,00,000), restaurant facilities operated by E, restaurant facilities operated by E, and dan dysium facilities operated by lessee, and dan dysium (insurance value of KRW 50,00,000) with the insurance period fixed from March 8, 2012 to March 8, 2017. The Plaintiff entered into a J insurance contract with G (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with the insurance period fixed from March 8, 2012 to March 8, 2017. The insurance period was KRW 20,000,000, with the entertainment facilities and house fixtures (insurance value of KRW 20,000,00) operated by G, and the insurance period was set from March 13, 2013 to March 13, 2016 (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

C. Before the opening of the instant Council member, C had operated the “L Council member” member at K at Briju, but around February 2009, C purchased M (the model name: N; hereinafter “the instant M”) manufactured and sold by the Defendant, and subsequently, used the instant M for the purpose of making soup, which is used for the physical treatment of the patients and the transfer of the instant M and the patients.

1) On April 26, 2014, around 04:00, the instant fire occurred (hereinafter “instant fire”).

(2) According to the results of the investigation conducted by the competent fire station and the police station, the fire of this case was used within F Council members. The fire of this case was used within F Council members.

arrow