The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is a favorable condition that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant is the first offender, and that there is a family member to support.

However, in light of the circumstances, details, and methods, etc., the crime of this case is disadvantageous to the fact that the nature of the crime is not good, the amount of damage is considerable, and the damage was not agreed with the victim, and the damage recovery was not properly performed.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence, there is no special change in circumstances that make the sentence different from the original court’s sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.