The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the contents and expressions of newspaper articles prepared by the defendant and the circumstances where the defendant did not confirm the objective facts in preparing the above newspaper articles, etc., the court below found the defendant not guilty of the facts charged in this case on the ground that the defendant had no purpose of slandering the victim at the time of preparing the above newspaper articles, but the court below found the defendant not guilty of the facts charged in this case on the ground that there was no purpose of slandering the victim. The

2. On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court, based on its reasoning, intended to slander the victim at the time when the Defendant prepared a newspaper article, such as the statement in the facts charged, submitted by the prosecutor as to the facts charged.

It is not sufficient to recognize the recognition.

In light of the above facts charged, the court acquitted the above facts charged.

The above judgment of the court below is justified in light of the circumstances admitted by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, and there is no error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the prosecutor.

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.