logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.03 2015가단121100
약정금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 8,250,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from May 15, 2012 to November 3, 2015; and (b) the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A around April 21, 2011, around April 21, 2011, a corporation filed a lawsuit against the Defendant, B, etc. regarding a loan claim [Cheongju District Court 201Dahap2149, 201Gahap2156 (Counterclaim)], and a limited liability law firm (Attorney D in charge) entered into a delegation contract with B on the said lawsuit and proceeded with the said lawsuit.

B. B filed a complaint against the F, who was the representative of the E Savings Bank, the telegraph of the said Savings Bank, on the charge of fraud, etc., and the F was not proven due to F’s failure to prove the suspicion, B was prosecuted on May 4, 2011 and prosecuted (Cheongju District Court 201Hadan797), and C (Law Firm C (Attorney in charge) (Attorney D) concluded a delegation contract with B on June 201 with the said lawsuit and continued the said lawsuit.

C. F, upon filing an application for compulsory execution against the Defendant, B, etc., the law firm (LLC) C (Attorney in charge) entered into a delegation contract with the Defendant for the following lawsuit with the Defendant, B, etc., and filed a lawsuit of objection (U.S. District Court 201Ga16588) against F on behalf of the Defendant and B, etc., and proceeded with the said lawsuit.

In the process of each of the above lawsuits, 80,000 U.S. dollars (Korean won 941,200,000 won was withdrawn on July 21, 2003) was deposited in the Korea Agricultural Cooperative Federation foreign exchange deposit account with payment for export. Accordingly, the issue of each lawsuit was that the law firm (Attorney G in charge) entered into a delegation contract with the Defendant with respect to the following lawsuit with the Defendant, and on October 6, 201, the law firm (Attorney G in charge) entered into a delegation contract with the Defendant with the Defendant (the number of the official gazette was 15%) and filed a lawsuit claiming damages, etc. (Seoul Central District Court 201Da104388, hereinafter referred to as the “instant subject suit”). The law firm (hereinafter referred to as the “LLC in charge”) in the above lawsuit with the Defendant as shown in the attached Form No. 2500, Feb. 16, 2012).

arrow