1. A notary public against the Plaintiff of the Defendants, No. 611, the document of 2011 drawn up by the three-way comprehensive law firm on July 18, 201.

(b) The intermediate payment of KRW 300 million in cash (payment of KRW 300 million as termination money on collateral of our bank): Of the obligations of our bank, set off contract amount of KRW 1.8 billion: The contract amount shall be deemed to have been concluded after the payment of KRW 200 million to Eul (the change of shareholder, the change of representative director, and the change of director shall be registered.

A shall pay KRW 300 million to B.

B shall terminate the security of the Bank provided to I, J, and K at the time of the Government of India with the amount of KRW 300 million received.

6. Transfer or acquisition of obligations to a purchaser and a trader;

1. As of August 31, 2012, all the accounts books of the seller and the current status of outstanding accounts shall be transferred to B to B;

2. As of August 31, 2012, the entire account books of the negotiating transaction partners B shall be transferred to A.

3.As of August 31, 2012, the inventory of raw materials and the receipts and disbursements of material containing non-explosion of products shall be transferred to B.

5. A person shall be liable for bonds with a seal affixed to a certificate for transfer or acquisition or for debts incurred other than those;

**** The remaining amount after settlement is received by Eul and the mother and child amount is calculated as payment by Eul.

3) After that, around August 31, 2012, L, who was an employee of the Plaintiff, drafted “the settlement document” as shown in attached Table 2 as “the settlement document on August 31, 201.” As of August 31, 2012, F and G confirmed that the settlement amount would be KRW 257,131,912 (i.e., the total sum of the current assets in the inventory assets in the outstanding amount - KRW 825,602,313 - the accounts payable 1,040,697,270 - the other non-performing non-performing loans 42,036,9555). G was appointed as the representative director of the Plaintiff on October 15, 2012.

C. Defendant B’s compulsory execution 1 based on the Notarial Deed of Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes (hereinafter “instant Promissory Notes”) as the representative director of the Plaintiff (D at that time), on July 18, 201, Defendant C is a one copy of the Promissory Notes (hereinafter “instant Promissory Notes”) composed of each Council-si, the issuer, the issuer, and the Defendants, respectively, at the time of payment as of December 31, 201.

A. The issue was made.

The defendants are on the same day.