logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.06.20 2018고단149
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 10. 20. 17:30 경 전 북 임실군 C에 있는 피고인의 깻잎 밭에서 피해자 D( 여, 87세) 이 허락 없이 깻잎을 따는 것을 보고 화가 나 피해자에게 다가가 그 곳에 있던 나무 지팡이를 양손으로 잡고 피해자의 오른 팔뚝을 2회, 오른쪽 골반 부위를 2회 내리쳐 피해자에게 약 42일 간의 치료가 필요한 우측 골반 골절 등의 상해를 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A place where emergency medical services are to be performed;

1. A photograph of damaged parts and a stick;

1. 상해진단서 [ 피고인과 변호인은, 피고인이 피해자에게 깻잎을 따지 말라고

After doing so, this article argues that there is no fact of leaving the victim as a stick.

살피건대, 앞서 든 증거들에 의하여 알 수 있는 바와 같이 피해자는 수사기관에서부터 이 법정에 이르기까지 ‘ 피고인의 밭에서 깻잎을 땄다는 이유로 피고인으로부터 피해자의 지팡이로 오른 팔뚝과 오른쪽 골반을 맞았다.

In full view of the fact that the defendant's report alone is not possible and that the defendant's report was changed and that the defendant was led and gathered, and that the statements on essential parts such as the developments of the assault are mutually consistent, the victim's body on the day of the incident and contacted 119, and that the victim discovered the part in the body of the victim's body and confirmed the reason for the contact with the 119 emergency medical service crew members "at around 17:0 o.e., the 119 emergency medical service crew members coming to stick to the Dong-dong residents," and that there was an action such as the victim's shock and the part above the right edge of the victim at the time, etc., as described in the judgment, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as described in the judgment.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted as applicable to the law.

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

arrow