The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal (one year of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The defendant shows his intention to recognize his mistake and to receive the rehabilitation treatment by the instant case.

It seems that the health situation is not good because the defendant suffers from a fry, and it is difficult to properly take food.

There are circumstances to consider the defendant as the victim of the crime of interference with business did not want the punishment under the agreement with the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is a crime committed during the same repeated period, and even though there was a record of punishment nine times for the same crime, it is against the truth by administering narcotics again.

It is difficult to see it.

In addition, the possibility of criticism is also high due to the fact that there are a number of criminal offenses.

Considering the various circumstances, including the above circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive for committing a crime, frequency of a crime, and circumstances after committing a crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.