The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal lies in the fact that the Defendant made the victim speak as stated in the facts charged, but at the time, the Defendant and the victim were located in the closed meeting room, and thus public performance is not recognized, and the Defendant did not have the intent to destroy the victim. Therefore, the offense of insult is not established.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding the grounds for appeal: (i) the victim took a 80 employee from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below to the effect that “the victim took a bath,” “,” “,” “,” and “the victim took a bath to the majority of all employees”; and (ii) the witness F of the court of the court below stated that the victim took a dispute between the defendant and the victim at the seat of the witness 15 meters away from the time of the crime of this case (as a record, it is somewhat unclear whether the defendant took a bath as above, but at least it is evident that the facts that the F used for the crime of this case had been insulting with the defendant and the victim, even if it is possible to individually or unspecified, if it satisfies the other party’s requirement, and thus, the victim’s new statement that “the victim took a public performance and the other party’s sexual intercourse is not deemed to meet the requirement of public performance,” and the defendant’s new statement that “as long as it satisfies the victim’s age requirement of performance and the other party.”

3. The appellate court for ex officio judgment shall have an effect on the judgment.