1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. The first instance court;

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation in this part is that the reasoning for the court’s reasoning is identical to that of “1. Basic Facts” among the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the part of the court of first instance as “the court of first instance.” As such, the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is the same as the part of “2. Plaintiff’s assertion” among the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the reasoning for the court’s explanation in this part is that of “2. Plaintiff’s assertion” among the grounds for

3. Determination as to the existence of negligence in medical treatment

A. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 4-14 and No. 25, the Plaintiff continuously appealed from 19:10 to June 30, 2012 (where no indication was made in the year, the pertinent date of 2012) after the instant surgery, and Defendant B immediately after the instant surgery.

6. On or around 30:15, around 30:15, a person was instructed to report the status of the plaintiff through a nurse and to administer a medical control, etc.

7.2. From 8:40 to 8:40, it is recognized that: (a) after checking the Plaintiff’s right angle, etc.; (b) performing blood climatic surgery, etc., the fact that he/she performed such surgery at around 11:10 on the same day is recognized.

B. However, in light of the following circumstances, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, including the above facts and evidence Nos. 16, is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant B was negligent in having delayed diagnosis and treatment thereof, and there is no other evidence to support this otherwise, and thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion cannot be accepted. The Plaintiff’s assertion is not acceptable. The Plaintiff’s assertion is not acceptable. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on Nov. 26, 2014, and there is no evidence to support this otherwise.

1 The initial symptoms of the 1st group after the subdivision are very serious pain, and the pain is subjective.