A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 05:00 on January 5, 2017, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim E (28 tax) E, which is located in Seojin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the part of the Defendant: (a) after drinking alcohol with the victim due to an influence, the Defendant went beyond the victim’s body due to an influence; (b) after going up to the victim’s body due to an influence, the Defendant got off the victim’s face for about 20 minutes; and (c) on the part of kne and knee, the Defendant sent the victim’s face and body on a number of occasions.

[1] The defendant's alleged assaults the victim.

However, since the victim went back to a university parking lot immediately after the victim was abused, it cannot be readily concluded that the Defendant’s assault committed an assault that led to the Defendant’s blood transfusion by leaving approximately 6 weeks of opening to the two areas requiring approximately 6 weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant committed considerable time violence to the victim’s face and head, such as drinking and knee-free, fel-fel-fel-fel-fel-feel-feel-feel-feel-feel-feel-feel-feasing her head, her head-fe-feasing, and her head-fe-feasing.

In the case where the victim was finally discovered, the floor of the university parking lot with a boundary of a height of 60 to 80cm from the place where the victim was finally discovered (the investigation record 104 pages), and in the case where the victim was removed or used from the place where the victim was found, the head part can be seen as skeing. However, at the time of finding the victim, the victim was faced with the boundary seat or floor in the place where the victim was located.

It seems that there is no special credit.

Comprehensively taking account of these circumstances, there is a substantial relation between the Defendant’s assault and the victim’s injury on credit with no two open wounds.

It is reasonable to view it.

Therefore, we cannot accept the above argument.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police officer with respect to E, G and H.