All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The reason for appeal is that the victim had no intention to participate in the service of the victim by distorted the intention of the victim, even though he visited the church for the purpose of towing him as a legitimate registrant;

On the premise, the lower court acquitted the Defendants of the facts charged. In so determining, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. Taking into account the various circumstances acknowledged by the lower court based on the evidence duly examined and adopted by the lower court, the victim did not have any intent to attend the course.

We affirm the judgment of the court below as just.

The court below is just in finding the Defendants not guilty of the facts charged that the Defendants interfered with the legitimate exercise of rights by the victims relating to the attendance of church worship, and there was a mistake by mistake in the facts alleged in the grounds for appeal

subsection (b) of this section.

3. We cannot accept the appeal by the prosecutor of conclusion.