1. As to the claim No. 1 listed in the separate sheet between F and Defendant C, the separate sheet between Defendant D and F.

1. The following facts are not disputed between the parties or may be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence 1 to 4, Gap evidence 9 to 11, Gap evidence 14 and 15 (including serial numbers), and the whole purport of the arguments as a result of the inquiry into facts by the Court Administration of this Court.

1) Parties F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”)

(2) The Plaintiffs are the creditors of the purchase price for goods against F (Plaintiff A: 104,805,594, Plaintiff B:81,313,200), Defendant C is the de facto spouse of Defendant C, Defendant D is the father of Defendant C, and Defendant E is the representative of F as the internal director of F.

B. On August 22, 2011, F and the Defendants transferred KRW 275,00,000 (75,000,000 out of China Contract Balance Claim and KRW 200,000,000, out of the claim for new engineering (hereinafter referred to as "new engineering") between F and F, and F, F entered into a contract for the transfer of the claim amounting to KRW 275,000,000 against the new engineering and notified the transfer of the claim amounting to KRW 275,00,000 against the new engineering (hereinafter referred to as "new engineering"), and F filed a claim for the payment order against the new engineering around August 30, 201, which became final and conclusive by the time limit for compulsory execution against the new engineering (Article 201,4357, which is the district court).

(A) On the other hand, the Seoul High Court 2014Na2002097 (Seoul High Court Decision 2012Gahap30072) brought a lawsuit in relation to the obligation to pay the acquisition amount between the Gwangju High Court and the New World Engineering Co., Ltd. (Seoul High Court 201Gahap20495).

3 F. 3.