beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff, Defendant C, Defendant C, Defendant E, Defendant E, KRW 5,99,755, and each of the said money from July 24, 2014 to August 2016.
Reasons
1. Claim against Defendant C and E
A. Indication of claims: To describe the part as to the above Defendants among the grounds for the claims in the attached Form.
(b) Defendant C: A judgment based on service by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(3)2): Defendant E: A judgment of deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)
b. Claim against Defendant B, D, and F
A. Basic facts [The grounds for recognition: (a) Defendant B received a text message from an unqualified person on July 22, 2014 that he/she would transfer the passbook and cash card at the post office (G) and sent it to an unqualified person via a direct bus in Seoul from the voice to Seoul. (b) Defendant D sent the passbook and e-mail card from an unqualified person on the case basis of sending the passbook and e-mail card, and (c) Defendant D proposed that he/she will offer KRW 1.5 million per week per day, and KRW 6 million per month, and transferred the passbook and e-mail card from the next terminal to the next terminal to the next terminal in Seoul. (C) Defendant D transferred the passbook and e-mail card from an unqualified person on July 2, 2014.
3) Defendant F was sent a text message that, if he borrowed a passbook and card from a person who was unaware of his name, he would give KRW 3 million monthly, and around July 2014, Defendant F opened a deposit account (I) at the post office located in Jinjin-gun, Jinjin-gun, and transferred the said passbook and card to the person who was unaware of his name due to the freight of the Seoul High-speed bus in order to receive compensation for the said passbook and card. 4) The above person in default of name was transferred the said means of access from the said Defendants to the Plaintiff at around July 24, 2014 after the said Defendants received the said means of access from the said Defendants, the said person misrepresented the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s deposit account was connected to the financial fraud, and actively cooperate with the investigation. On the same day, using the financial transaction information identified by the Plaintiff on the same day, the Plaintiff’s Nong Bank (K) account in the Plaintiff’s name to the above post office account of Defendant B, and Defendant D’s above.