1. The Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff is a promissory note No. 1007, 2009, No. 1007, July 2, 2009.

1. On March 2009, the Plaintiff became aware of E through the introduction of D, a lessee of the building owned by the Plaintiff. On June 23, 2009, the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 170 million from the network B to lend money to E (hereinafter “instant loan”).

(2) On July 2, 2009, the Plaintiff: (a) on July 2, 2009, determined that the amount of the instant loan is KRW 170 million at face value; (b) the issuer; (c) the issuer; (d) the issuer; and (e) the date of issuance on July 2, 2009; and (e) a notary public prepared and issued a notarial deed of promissory notes (hereinafter “instant notarial deed”) as No. 1007, a date of payment on July 2, 2009.

3) After paying KRW 150 million out of the above borrowed money to E, the Plaintiff prepared and kept a cash custody certificate of KRW 150 million from E on June 24, 2009, and KRW 150 million from E. 4) In order to secure the repayment of the instant loan to the network B, the Plaintiff created a collateral security (hereinafter “instant collateral security”) with the Seoul East Eastern District Court Decision No. 52148, Jun. 23, 2009; No. 102, Nos. 102, 102, and 104 of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F apartment Complex No. 1, 104 (hereinafter “each of the instant stores”) as joint collateral, each of the instant collateral security (hereinafter “instant collateral security”).

5) On October 10, 201, while the Plaintiff and D (joint and several obligors) agreed to repay the sum of KRW 210,000,000,000 to the net B by December 20, 201, the Plaintiff and D agreed to transfer the ownership of the entire real estate subject to the instant No. 1 collateral mortgage to the network B and transfer all the house and facilities within the commercial building, and if the Plaintiff and D did not comply with the instant content, they will not object to any legal measure (hereinafter “instant agreement”).