logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.08.25 2014가단218237
유류분반환
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The deceased E (Death on November 13, 2005) and the deceased F (Death on October 13, 2009) have children under Sk, G, the defendant C, the defendant C, the defendant C, the defendant C, the defendant C, the defendant C, the defendant C, the defendant C, the defendant C, the defendant C, the defendant C, the defendant B, the plaintiff B, the defendant I (pre-name), the defendant D (pre-name K).

B. On October 28, 200, Defendant C completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale on October 27, 2000, with respect to Lousand Housing (hereinafter “instant L Site and Housing”) and its ground-based detached housing owned by the network E.

C. 1) On the other hand, Defendant D is the M&M 825 square meters on September 8, 2000 (hereinafter “instant M/M site”).

A) The registration of ownership transfer is completed on the ground of sale as of August 18, 200, and the above ground housing and warehouse buildings (hereinafter “instant M buildings”) are registered.

On March 12, 2001, the registration of ownership preservation was completed on March 12, 2001 with respect to M, but the registration of ownership transfer was completed on August 23, 2001 with respect to M’s land and building on August 21, 2001. 2) After that, on April 16, 2004, the deceased F sold N the instant M’s land and building at KRW 1.5 million to N and completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the said land and building on April 19, 2004.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including branch numbers for those with branch numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers for those with branch numbers), witness N's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that Defendant C purchased the instant L site and housing amounting to KRW 250 million from the deceased E, and paid KRW 50 million out of the purchase price, Defendant D received KRW 150 million from N, and Defendant D received KRW 312,967,536 from the deceased E's bank account, and the total sum of the termination payment of the Plaintiff's bank account in the name of the deceased E is KRW 160,000,000 in lieu of the networkF.

arrow