logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.02.06 2011고단1963 (1)
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 18, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Daejeon District Court on January 13, 2006, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on January 13, 2006. On July 16, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Daejeon District Court's Incheon District Court's Branch Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 3, 2008.

[2011 Highest 1963] On March 3, 2008, the Defendant concluded a contract with the victim D to purchase the land of Pyeongtaek-si E, F, G, and H to the effect that “The instant officetel construction is leased KRW 100 million.”

However, the Defendant, at the time, did not conclude a sales contract on the above land, and did not have any economic ability to pay the down payment, and there was no intention or ability to pay the down payment. The Defendant stated that I, etc., a seller, “to prepare only one contract necessary for the preparation of the purchase price,” and received only a sales contract concerning the above land from them, and even if borrowing money from the victim, he was planned to use the above land for any purpose other than the above land price, and even if borrowing KRW 100 million from the victim, he did not have any intent or ability to pay the above officetel construction or to pay KRW 100 million.

On March 7, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 100 million from the K judicial scrivener office located in the JJ on March 7, 2008, and acquired it by fraud.

[2012Ha] L around March 2008, around 2008, the defendant and the defendant were to perform the studio construction work and entered into a construction contract.

However, when the construction cost to be paid to L is completed, the defendant received the studio building as collateral and borrowed the studio building.

However, L and the defendant are the construction cost of the studio building in the above M.

arrow