1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a non-corporate body established on August 26, 1990 for the development and research of C. The Plaintiff is an oriental medical doctor from May 2003 to August 2016.

B. On March 26, 2017, at the regular meeting of the delegates held on March 26, 2017, the Defendant proposed an urgent proposal of “the deprivation of qualification and expulsion of qualification for the Plaintiff’s punishment” while 13 of the total members were present, and passed a resolution with the consent of all participants.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant resolution”). C.

Among the defendant's rules, the procedures for expulsion of members shall be as follows:

§ 9. (Rewards) This study may reward and take disciplinary action against members in accordance with the following provisions:

(1) The chairperson may award a reward to a person who has contributed significantly to the achievement and development of the objectives of this school, upon the recommendation of the board of directors.

(2) Any person who has harmed the honor of this school or has violated the obligations of members by doing any of the following acts shall be subject to disciplinary action upon deliberation and resolution by the board of directors, but shall be subject to ratification by the general meeting later:

Disciplinary action may be separately managed as a dormant member, or the qualification of a member may be suspended or expelled.

Provided, That the expelled person shall not be allowed to re-enter for the next two years.

1. A person who violates the regulations, the board of directors, and the matters resolved at a general meeting;

2. A person who has advertised by academic terms or diagnosis and treatment not recognized by the academic council or has responded to coverage of news, daily newspapers, etc.;

3. Other persons who have committed an act contrary to the intent of the establishment of the principal school council [based on the recognition], entry in Gap evidence 1, 3 and 5 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The Plaintiff’s argument in this case is null and void because of the following serious defects.

The defendant expelled the plaintiff through a resolution of the representative general meeting of delegates, which is the expulsion of members, shall be made by resolution of the board of directors and later.