The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment, additional collection 1,003,00 won) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is recognized that the defendant purchased philophones twice even though he is not a narcotics handler, administered part of them, smoked marijuana once, and the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected it.

However, the defendant has been punished for 10 months of suspended sentence of 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for 1993 and 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for 2006 (the above narcotics crime was punished as concurrent crimes with the crime of violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents), 2012, and 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months of 200 and 1 year and 2 months of imprisonment with prison labor for 2001, and without prison labor for 10 months of 200 and 1 year and 2 months of 2001, and it is not good to repeat the crime of this case. The defendant has repeatedly committed the crime of this case within a short period of time, considering that the degree of addiction is not less than that of the defendant, and the result of an appraisal of the defendant's maternity, etc., narcotics crime seems to require isolation from society for a certain period of time, and thus, it seems unnecessary for the court below to punish the criminal act of this case beyond the punishment of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Provided, That the burden of litigation costs shall be governed by the proviso of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.