The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) does not mean that the victim “hys and salping” is “hys and salms,” or that the victim seems to have been injured, and even if the defendant acted as such, it does not constitute intimidation constituting a crime of intimidation merely because it is merely an expression of temporary decentralization, even if the defendant acted as such.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts and adversely affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below also asserted the same purport as the argument of mistake of facts, and the court below rejected the defendant's assertion by giving a detailed statement of the grounds for its judgment.

The circumstances described in the court below are as follows: ① the victim testified to the effect that it corresponds to the facts charged in this case in the court of original instance and duly adopted and investigated by the court of original instance; ② the victim's statement specifically explains the situation at the time; ② the defendant's wife and the victim can not find any special contradiction as well as the statement at the investigation agency; ② his wife and the victim's continuing to make a horse match in the elevator; ② the defendant's appearance in ctV continues to make a horse match immediately after the defendant's wife and the victim board the elevator, and even though the victim continued to put the horse match in a considerable time (not less than 45 seconds after the victim entered the elevator into the elevator, until the defendant ctv turns out to the point of view, while the defendant's secret saving or ct and ctrick to the point of view that the defendant did not go to the point of view, while the defendant did not go to the point of view that he did not go to the ct.