Text
On June 10, 2020, the defendant's Changwon Branch 2020 Ghana 1192 collection gold case against the plaintiff was dated 10,020.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant filed a claim suit against C by the Changwon District Court Decision 2019Gaz. 7618, Seoul High Court Decision 2015 decided to recommend reconciliation made by the said court.
B. After January 29, 2020, the Defendant issued a claim amounting to KRW 18,655,980 based on the decision of the Changwon District Court 2020 to recommend reconciliation (i.e., the original amount of KRW 18,093,850 and delayed damages, execution expenses) as the claim amount, and “C shall not attach the following claims:
4. Amount equivalent to 1/2 of wages, pensions, salaries, bonuses, retirement pension and other wage claims of similar nature: Provided, That where the amount falls short of the amount prescribed by Presidential Decree in consideration of the minimum cost of living under the Guarantee of Basic Living Security Act, or exceeds the amount prescribed by Presidential Decree in consideration of the cost of living of standard households, the amount prescribed by Presidential Decree concerned shall apply respectively;
"Amount prescribed by Presidential Decree in consideration of the minimum cost of living under the National Basic Living Security Act" in the proviso to Article 3 (Minimum Amount Prohibited from Attachment) of the Enforcement Decree of the Civil Execution Act (Article 246 (1) 4 of the Act means 1850,000 won per month.
(other) The order of seizure and collection (hereinafter “instant seizure and collection order”) against “” was issued, and the instant seizure and collection order was served on the Plaintiff on February 3, 2020.
(c)
On June 10, 2020, the Defendant filed a claim for collection against the Plaintiff under the jurisdiction of 1192, and the above court rendered a performance recommendation to the effect that “the Plaintiff shall pay damages for delay from February 4, 2020 to the Defendant” (hereinafter referred to as “decision on the execution recommendation of this case”) to the effect that “the Plaintiff shall pay damages for delay from KRW 18,655,980 to the Defendant,” and it became final and conclusive on the ground that the Plaintiff did not file an objection even after receiving the notification.