logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.09.26 2018나2060244
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff lost against Defendant E, which corresponds to the following additional payment order.

Reasons

1. The grounds for this part of the basic facts are as stated in the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance (Paragraph 1). Thus, this part of the reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Claim against Defendant E

A. Defendant E, along with the Plaintiff, committed a tort of assaulting and injuring the Plaintiff.

Therefore, Defendant E should compensate for damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to the above tort.

B. 1) The reasons why the court should explain this part of the daily income and treatment expenses are identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance from 6th to 9th 1st . Thus, the reason why this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is limited according to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2) The reason why this court should explain this part of the judgment as to this part is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (the part of the judgment of the court of first instance from 4th to 6th 7th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e.

B) The Plaintiff’s property damages amounting to KRW 83,084,92,92, including the Plaintiff’s actual revenues of KRW 9,782,02,00, in total, KRW 73,020,00, KRW 83,084,92, the Defendant E’s liability is determined as KRW 58,00,00, in consideration of the circumstances as seen in the foregoing paragraph (a). 3) The reasons why the court should explain this part is the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance.

arrow