beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The following facts of basic facts may be acknowledged either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the whole purport of the pleadings stated in Gap evidence 1 to 5, 10 to 13, and Eul evidence 2 to 8 (including serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply):
Defendant Substitute Securities Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Substitute Securities”) is a stock company that runs financial investment business under Article 6(1) of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (hereinafter “Capital Markets Act”). The Plaintiff is a person who trades stocks and derivative financial instruments from the securities account opened on behalf of the Defendant in the securities account. Defendant B is a person who manages the Plaintiff’s above securities account while working at C branch of the Defendant Substitute Securities and Exchange and made an investment recommendation on financial investment instruments.
B. On November 29, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) died on the part of the husband, D (hereinafter “the deceased”); (b) changed the name on the securities account opened in the Defendant Substitute Securities Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Treatment Securities Co., Ltd”) and the Dongyang Securities Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) on October 1, 2014; (c) succeeded to the shares, etc. on the securities account opened in the Dongyang Securities Co., Ltd. and the Hyan Securities Co., Ltd.; and (d) continued the investment of shares, etc. upon requesting the management of the securities account opened in the Defendant Substitute Securities Co., Ltd. to the Defendant B, who was the deceased’s seat; and (d) on October 1, 2013, the so-called Dong Yang Securities Co., Ltd., which was at issue with the fraud sale of the Dongyang Securities Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., and subsequently, traded the shares, etc. deposited in the Dong Yang Securities by Defendant B’s solicitation.
C. The Plaintiff’s trading volume through the Plaintiff’s alternative securities account has increased significantly from October 2013, and from November 25, 2013, from around November 25, 2013, the Plaintiff purchased a loan from the Defendant’s alternative securities and traded shares.
On March 28, 2013, the Plaintiff’s product No. 41 of Balance LS from the Defendant Substitute Securities Account.