The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The prosecutor's grounds for appeal are as follows: (a) the victim F's investigative agency that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case; and (b) each of the statements at the second trial date, witness E, G, and I's investigative agency on the second trial date of the lower court, despite credibility, the lower court rejected all of the statements and acquitted the Defendant. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and by misapprehending the legal principles.

2. Determination

A. On January 22, 201, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case was that the Defendant argued that the Defendant “Ahna” was a time to challenge the said E while drinking in concert with E and its daily behaviors in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., and doing so.

Defendant F (the age 32) of the victim F (the age 32) who was followed while intending to boom the above E and B, citing beer disease during the dispute with the above E and B B, and intending to see this, the victim F (the age 32) who was next to the Defendant, was frighter, who was a dangerous object used by the Defendant to fright the Defendant, fright the victim’s fright, and frightered the victim’s frighter, and fright the victim’s frighter, and fright the victim’s frighter and frightered the victim’s frighter, and led the victim to a multi

Accordingly, the defendant carried a beer, which is a dangerous thing, and inflicted an injury on the victim.

B. The lower court rendered a judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the grounds as follows.

1) As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, F’s statement in the investigative agency and the statement in each investigative agency of F on the second trial date, G, E, and I on the second trial date. The victim F of the 2nd trial date of the lower trial in the lower trial, “The Defendant saw beer and knee, while he was in the process of the trial, and knee and knee and knee and knee and knee his knee.

“After making a statement to the effect that it was “,” the fourth trial date of the lower court, the same as E was at this point.

As a result, how we would have been faced with anyone is well aware of.

“.....”