A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From September 1, 2013 to November 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the establishment of the 5th floor “D marina site” of the Da building in Ansan-si, from around September 1, 2013 to around November 01, 2013, the Defendant was equipped with six smuggling, four waiting rooms, four waiting rooms, and four female employees, including E, with four female employees, and received KRW 120,00 to 130,000,000 from the guest F, etc., and had female employees sexual intercourse with customers, thereby raising profits of approximately KRW 30,000 per day average of the 30,000 per day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against G, H, I, E, J, K, and F;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A criminal investigation report (Calculation of criminal proceeds) and an investigation report (attached to the details of passbook transactions submitted by a suspect, etc.);

1. Business account books, commercial monthly contracts, and commercial trade account books;

1. A copy of each specification of transactions of agricultural cooperatives and Japanese banks;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, site photographs, and seized articles;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 and 2 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The reasons for sentencing in the latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. are as follows: (a) even when the defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 7,00,000 on August 30, 2013 on the grounds that he/she had engaged in the act of arranging commercial sex acts from March 2013 to May 2013; and (b) from September 2013 to November 2013, the act of arranging commercial sex acts, etc. was committed as stated in the crime; and (c) in light of the fact that he/she continued to operate his/her business even after being exposed to the police officer on September 2013 and was again discovered at November 2013, the crime is deemed to be inferior.

However, the defendant exceeds the fine.