Text
1. The Defendant shall comply with the procedures for reporting the closure of business as to the business report stated in the attached business report to the Plaintiff.
2...
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The source of the party’s status, the Defendant, from January 1, 2012 to his school from around July 3, 2014, was engaged in living together on the premise that he/she is remarried from around July 3, 2014 to August 1, 2015.
B. Business takeover and conclusion of a lease contract 1) The 1st floor of the 1st floor of the building located in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-do (hereinafter “instant building”).
(E) The Plaintiff’s words “E” was a general restaurant with D’s trade name. However, on May 20, 2014, F, who was the Plaintiff’s words, acquired all the rights to the said restaurant and facilities from D, but paid D the amount of KRW 40 million as premium. (ii) F, on July 6, 2014, leased the instant building from one other than G, the owner of the instant building, to the end of July 6, 2016, from KRW 20 million as deposit money, KRW 1 million as rent, KRW 1 million as rent, and period from July 7, 2014 to July 6, 2016.
(3) F is a general restaurant (hereinafter “instant restaurant”) in the name of “H” on the instant building.
After opening the restaurant, on July 17, 2014, after completing the simplified taxable person’s business registration at the regional tax office, or completing the report of general restaurant business at the competent tax office, and thereafter, the Plaintiff operated the restaurant in this case along with the Plaintiff. (C) As seen earlier, F and the Plaintiff reported that F will close the restaurant in this case as of November 7, 2014 at the regional tax office having jurisdiction over the instant restaurant on November 3, 2014, when the business registration and the report of the general restaurant business in this case was completed, and thereafter F and the Plaintiff are likely to be unable to receive the national pension due to the above business registration, etc.
2) Accordingly, after changing the lessee’s name under the instant lease agreement to the Defendant, who had been living together with the Plaintiff, the Defendant regarding the instant restaurant, as indicated in the attached business report to the competent authority on October 29, 2014 (hereinafter “instant business report”).