A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner and lessor of Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si C 401, and E is the lessee and the F is the new lessee of the said singing room.

On May 18, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 5 million from F in the instant singing room, and entered into a lease agreement with F on May 25, 2013 with respect to the said singing room with the effect that: (a) the instant lease agreement was concluded on May 25, 2013; and (b) if the instant lease agreement was not concluded, E entered into a lease agreement with F with the terms of the said agreement.

On the other hand, on May 27, 2013, the Defendant demanded the F to terminate the above contract and return the provisional contract deposit amount of five million won, and the Defendant was subject to the lawsuit to return the provisional contract deposit, and was willing to file a complaint against F and E with the intent of forging the provisional contract.

Therefore, around June 5, 2013, the Defendant, at a private office located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, prepared a provisional contract by inserting one million won for the lease of Danoo-gu to F. However, F, at will, the amount of the provisional contract under the provisional contract, is placed in five million won at will, and “the license shall be transferred to F for business convenience even before this contract is entered, and the provisional contract shall be returned if it is not entered into,” thereby forging the provisional contract by arbitrarily inserting the contents that “The license shall be transferred to F for business convenience, and the provisional contract shall be returned at the time when the contract is not concluded,” and the Defendant continued to request F to return five million won by using the forged provisional contract, but the request was rejected to punish him and attempted.” On June 11, 2013, the Defendant made a false investigation into the public office and the public office and the public office and the public office and the public office and the public office and the public office and the public office and the private office and the public office and the public office and private office.

However, the facts are the terms of the lease agreement between the defendant and the F.