logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.07.16 2012고단6848
출판물에의한명예훼손
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a member of the Gwangju District Office of the D Group, and the victim E was elected on April 27, 2012 by the chairperson of the D Organization, and had the victim's previous conviction and mental disorder so much.

The part of the facts charged that the defendant raised an objection to the election commission, etc. was deleted as there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

Defendant: (a) On June 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (b) requested an advertisement to the Don Pream Advertising Board located in the Chungcheongnam-gu Seoul Western-ro, Seodaemun-gu; and (c) “In an unjust manner” at the lower end of the Fer

4. 27. Election, E, which was elected to the head of the D Organization, is habitually a crime of embezzlement, breach of trust, or genocide of a group of members, and, i.e., resignation of a member.

The advertisement was inserted in the title of "... The defendant is a person who habitually commits a crime of embezzlement and breach of trust in the name of "(the reason why the elected person E of the chairperson should be dismissed)" in the advertisement.

- Gwangju District Court Decision 97 High-Ma3803 (Joint Judgment 98.15, Dec. 15, 2006), - 2006 High-Ma1396 (2 years of suspended execution of ten months), - 2007 High-Ma2087 (2 million won of September 11, 2007) (2007) (5 million won of subsidies) - Head of the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs Cooperation-127 (7 July 21, 2008) (200,000 won of subsidies) - Head of the Welfare Center of the D Association, approximately two million won (2 million won of subsidies for embezzlement) were not habitually stated in the decision to grant subsidies, - Head of the Gwangju District Court Decision 99 High-MaMa1396 (206, Sep. 26, 2009), 200, G209 (3 million won of 2006).

Accordingly, the defendant's honor is the victim by openly pointing out facts in publications with the aim of slandering the victim.

arrow