Defendants are not guilty.

1. At around 20:00 on June 14, 2013, the Defendants jointly held that the victim G (the 61-year-old age), who was in F apartment, was in in secret relationship with the victim and the Defendant D’s wife, and had the victim into the victim into the victim’s injury. While Defendant D had the victim into the victim’s injury, Defendant D had the victim’s injury. Defendant A had the victim sled that “I will cut back to sprink, saw, saw, and saw to spack.” Defendant A had prepared to sprink, saw, saw, and saw that “I will kill the spack, spack, and spack to death.” The rest of the Defendants expressed that “I will kill the spack, spack, and spack to death.”

2. The gist of the Defendants’ defense counsel did not constitute intimidation as stated in the facts charged.

3. The judgment is based on the following circumstances, i.e., the victim, H's investigative agency, and this court, which are evidence corresponding to the above facts charged, but the records revealed that in relation to the time when the defendants made intimidation to the victim, the victim made the above intimidation after the defendants came into the victim's residence and put them onto the victim's vehicle. However, H stated in this court that the defendants made intimidation immediately after the victim's entry into the victim's residence, and subsequently made the victim's objection, etc., and that H did not coincide with each other; ② in this court, H stated that "the defendant directly made the victim's statement that "I have been placed in the office with the victim's view to death", but in the police police, the victim made a statement to the effect that "no such statement was directly made from the defendant A, but it was hot due to the fact that it was done by the victim's entry into the victim's residence."