1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the court of first instance.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is that "12% per annum" in Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "15% per annum", that the "15% per annum" in Part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "12% per annum", that the "O" in Part 4 is "B", and that the plaintiff added or emphasized the judgment on the assertion that the plaintiff added or emphasized in the trial of the court of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional determination

A. The purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff’s assertion that, at the time of executing the seizure of corporeal movables against the Defendant by using the instant promissory note’s authentic deed as the executive title, the attachment of corporeal movables against the Defendant is not permissible against the good faith principle, even though the Defendant silented the instant debt, it would not be permitted against the principle of good faith.

B. According to the reasoning of the judgment below, Gap evidence No. 4-1 and No. 2, around January 27, 2012, the plaintiff executed the seizure of corporeal movables against the defendant as the title of execution of the instant promissorysory note No. 4-1 and No. 2 with the title of execution of the said apartment as to the above apartment. At the time of the execution of the seizure, the defendant was not present at the time of the execution of the above seizure, and the defendant's trial money S participated. The above facts and the evidence submitted by the plaintiff are hard to see that the defendant disputing the plaintiff's claim in this case is against the principle of trust and good faith, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise,

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant should be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.