1. Defendant (Appointed Party) D, E, R, Defendant J, K, M, P, Q, Selection W, X, and Y jointly and severally against the Plaintiff 6,041,80 won.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) Plaintiff A and the designated parties Z (AC) A, AA(AD) AB (AE), Defendant I (AF), L (AG) and O (AH) (hereinafter the above designated parties and six said Defendants are “six Z, etc.”

(2) The Plaintiff B and C are the parents of the Plaintiff (the appointed party; hereinafter the “Defendant”) who are the Defendant (the appointed party; hereinafter the “Defendant”) D, the appointed party X, and the Defendant E are Defendant I’s, the Defendant J, the Defendant M, and the N, the Defendant P, and Q are the parents of the appointed party, the designated party, the Defendant P, and the Defendant L are the Defendant P, the designated party, the Defendant P, the Defendant P, and the Defendant R are the respective parents of the designated party A (hereinafter the aforementioned Defendants’ parents and the aforementioned designated parties are referred to as “Defendant D, etc.”), and the Defendant G and H are the parents of the Defendant F.

3) At the time of March 2012 to May 5, 2012, Defendant T was a fenced teacher of the first grade and third grade of AJ middle school, Defendant U’s assistant principal of the same middle school, and Defendant V’s assistant principal of the same middle school. (B) On May 21, 2012, Plaintiff C reported that Plaintiff C was subject to Z, AA, AB, Defendant F, I, and L from school inside and outside of the school, and that Plaintiff C was subject to collective care in response to school violence since March 21, 2012.

2) AJ Middle School Violence Autonomous Committee for Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “Autonomous Committee”).

(3) On June 26, 2012, following the meeting of the autonomous committee, it is difficult to take any measure since there is no clear and objective evidence on the continuous and repeated bullying of the Plaintiff’s assertion. However, with respect to the part in which the Plaintiff claimed difficulties, the Plaintiff decided that the designated person, AA, AB, Defendant F, I, L, who reported as the perpetrator, recommend the Plaintiff to make a verbal apology, and operate a program for improving the friendship for 10 hours at 10 hours. (3) The Plaintiff C, while dissatisfied with the above decision of the autonomous committee on June 26, 2012, determined that the designated person, AA, AB, Defendant F, I, L, and Defendant O (hereinafter the designated person and the said Defendants.)