A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 15, 2015, at around 20:25, the Defendant driven BM5 car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 15 km from the front of the fireworks Village, which was frighted in the inurnic epolitic epolitic epolitic epolitic epolitic epolitic epolitic epolitic epolitic epolitic epolitic epolitic epolitic epoch.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of alcohol and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the report on the circumstances of drivers;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 3 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44-2 (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act include a lot of records that the Defendant was punished due to drinking driving, and the Defendant should be punished strictly because of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor on the records of the punishment.

However, recently, in consideration of the fact that there is no record of punishment for drinking driving, and the fact that the crime of this case is recognized and reflected, the punishment is determined as per the order.