logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.10.01 2013고단1296
공무상표시무효
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person working as the director of the corporation B.

On December 13, 2012, 2012, the enforcement officer C attached the timber in custody at the open storage and storage of the F Co., Ltd. in Bosung-gun E and attached a seizure mark to the timber by accepting the delegation of execution by creditor D, based on the original decision in lieu of the executory mediation of the construction cost case of the Gwangju District Court No. 2018.

However, from December 27, 2012 to January 3, 2013, the Defendant, among the timber marked with the above seizure number 1,8-14, 17, 21-30, 34, and 48, among the timber marked in the open storage and warehouse of F Co., Ltd., the Defendant removed the seizure mark and used it to the Corporation.

As a result, the defendant has harmed the effectiveness of the attachment indication that public officials performed in relation to their duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused and G by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to H, D, and I;

1. A copy of report on attachment of corporeal movables;

1. A copy of a receipt;

1. A report of inspection of seized objects;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the protocol of decision substituting conciliation date and conciliation;

1. Relevant Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow